From Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B. Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. l. & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting High School Students’ Cognitive Engagement and Achievement: Contributions of Classroom Perceptions and Motivation Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462-482

Constructs & Items

NOTE: We recommend a six point Likert-type agreement scale for these items. We have used a 4 point scale, a 5 point and a 6 point and strongly prefer the 6 poing.

The first instrument was Beliefs about Classroom Structures--there were three subscales

Motivating Tasks

 

Mastery Evaluation

Autonomy

The second instrument measured Self-efficacy

The third instrument measured goals and perceived instrumentality with three subscales that began with

I do the work in this class because . . .

Mastery Goals

Performance Goals -Approach

Perceived Instrumentality

The fourth instrument measured Study Strategies

 

OU Home | Disclaimer | Copyright | Equal Opportunity | OU Web Policy