Friday, October 28, 2005

Tabler and Young on Syria's Future

Here are two editorial from the IH Tribune. Both journalists know that that Syria is unlike to cooperate with the international investigation so long as all the leaders of the regime are targets. Andrew Table, a Syrian based journalist, proposes that America offer Bashar al-Asad a way out by refraining to target him personally and by offering to open the oil pipeline between Iraq and Syria as a sweetener. Michael Young, a Lebanese journalist, suggest that the Syrian opposition take maters into its own hands, become a more effective force, and overthrow the regime.

Addendum: Michael Young just sent me this correction. He is right, of course. Sorry Michael:


Thanks for highlighting my IHT piece, but can I ask you to write a correction on your blog. You write: "Michael Young, a Lebanese journalist, suggests that the Syrian opposition take maters into its own hands, become a more effective force, and overthrow the regime." In fact I didn't say that at all, and am far more ambiguous about the issue than you make it sound. All I did, as you can clearly read in the last paragraph, is say that persistent uncertainty in Syria might lead to that outcome. I wasn't advocating anything here, and I'm surprised you should state this since the paragraph is quite clear.

Best regards,
America should test who's in charge in Damascus
Andrew Tabler, International Herald Tribune

DAMASCUS The UN investigator Detlev Mehlis's implication of "senior Lebanese and Syrian officials" in the assassination of the former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri is sure to set off a firestorm of debate on how to pressure Damascus to comply with the ongoing investigation. As all eyes turn to President Bashar al-Assad and what he will do next, it is imperative that Washington not miss an opportunity to determine who is worth dealing with in Damascus.

For nearly five years, I have worked as a journalist and researcher in Syria covering the country's reform process. Over dinner with diplomats and other foreign visitors in Damascus, one question arises more frequently every year: Is Assad in control of Syria?

CNN even asked Assad himself the question last week. Assad answered, "You cannot be a dictator and not be in control." Or can you? Since Assad came to power in July 2000, everything from the slow pace of reform to Damascus's reticence to pull its troops out of Lebanon has been blamed on Assad's weakness vis-à-vis the "old guard" -regime members who remain from the 30-year rule of Bashar's father, Hafez.

When this belief began to affect relations with America - most notably U.S. demands on Syria concerning Iraq - Washington changed its Syria policy from one of "constructive engagement" to "constructive instability." This has included increased sanctions, public threats and even reported cross-border skirmishes along the Iraqi-Syrian frontier. And most notably, there has been a conspicuous lack of incentives for good behavior.

Then last week, out of the blue, with the Mehlis report looming, a high-ranking U.S. official confirmed rumors that Washington had offered Damascus a deal to get it off the hook in Lebanon for its accused involvement in Hariri's assassination in exchange for halting its alleged support for the Iraqi insurgency, ending all interference in Lebanese affairs and cutting off support for Hezbollah and Palestinian rejectionist groups. Damascus has reportedly turned down the offer.

It is perhaps understandable that such a proposal went nowhere, since it is unclear that there is anyone in Syria with enough authority to rewrite its foreign policy of the last 30 years. The penultimate version of the Mehlis report that was accidentally released, which names names, indicates just how fragmented this regime might actually be. The possibility that the president's brother and brother-in-law took it upon themselves to organize the assassination of a Middle Eastern statesman shows that, at the very least, Syria might be ruled by committee.

We need to find out if someone on this committee is in a position to negotiate with the United States, even as the sanctions process rumbles forward. Sanctions by themselves could be disastrous, creating chaos when the last thing we need is chaos in another Middle Eastern country. Multilateral pressure will only increase nationalist sentiments and regime paranoia that will hamstring an already troubled reform process.

Damascus's reform program is heavily assisted, if not sustained, by UN and European Union projects. Increased multilateral pressure on the regime could politicize Syria's already limited reform space, grinding progress to a halt. Such a situation needs to be avoided at all costs. Syria's high population growth rate of 2.85 percent, combined with pitifully low labor and capital productivity, means that current unemployment levels of 11 percent to 20 percent would only increase rapidly - something that could serve to fuel Islamic radicalism in Syria and the region.

So instead of just using the Hariri investigation to push Damascus to the brink through sanctions and watch Syria sink into the abyss, Washington should give Assad a chance to prove he is in charge. America could offer him a very special carrot to go along with the sanctions stick.

Allowing the reopening of the oil pipeline between Kirkuk in Iraq and the Syrian port of Banias, to see if Assad can keep it operating without acts of sabotage, would be a good first step in determining the degree to which he controls Syria. This would also alleviate U.S. troubles in exporting Iraqi oil and give Assad and the Syrian people a material incentive to help stabilize their neighbor. And, perhaps most important, this would open the door to a peaceful solution to what is looming as the next big crisis for the United States in the region.

There are some signs that Assad could be in a position to make good on such a deal. After the Hariri assassination in February, it appears that Assad has been consolidating power. Several high-ranking officials were retired during the Baath Party conference in June. Interior Minister Ghazi Kanan, a possible rival to Assad, died last week in what officials are calling a suicide.

At least for now, America needs someone inside the Assad regime it can deal with. But the Assad regime does not necessarily need America. The regime has plenty of experience surviving sieges, however chaotic. Damascus has been under U.S. sanctions since 1979, and it has become skilled at sneaking around them. It also has about $18 billion in cash reserves, the equivalent of about three years of current imports. Syria's Baathists are masters of the waiting game: Even if Bashar can't outwit or outplay George W. Bush, history shows that an Assad is capable of outlasting two-term U.S. presidents.

(Andrew Tabler is a fellow with the Institute of Current World Affairs based in Damascus and Beirut, and consulting editor for Syria Today magazine.)

Assad's dilemma
Michael Young, International Herald Tribune

BEIRUT The release last week of a United Nations report on the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri of Lebanon threatens to create a perfect storm of adversity for the regime of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria. By satisfying the international community's call that Syria cooperate with the inquiry of the UN prosecutor, Detlev Mehlis, Assad would undermine his domestic hold on power; by avoiding this, Assad would ensure Syria's almost total isolation and perhaps the imposition of international sanctions.

On Tuesday, the UN Security Council began discussing the Mehlis report. This came after Assad wrote a letter to the council, dated Sunday, in which he affirmed that while Syria was "innocent" of Hariri's Feb. 14 assassination, he was "ready to follow up action to bring to trial any Syrian who could be proved by concrete evidence to have had connection with this crime." The question now is how will Assad interpret his pledge.

In his report, Mehlis stated that his "investigation is not complete," and the UN secretary general, Kofi Annan, subsequently extended the inquiry until Dec. 15. But the prosecutor had enough confidence in the information he had garnered to add that there is "converging evidence pointing at both Lebanese and Syrian involvement in this terrorist act." The investigators further underlined that the Hariri assassination was prepared over several months, and was "carried out by a group with an extensive organization and considerable resources and capabilities."

Most damning, the report offered a context in which to interpret the findings, implying that individuals at the top of the Syrian and Lebanese political systems were aware of the Hariri plot: "Given the infiltration of Lebanese institutions and society by the Syrian and Lebanese intelligence services working in tandem, it would be difficult to envisage a scenario whereby such a complex assassination plot could have been carried out without their knowledge." This hit close to Assad: His brother-in-law, Assef Shawkat, heads Syria's military intelligence.

There was more: A witness also pointed to the involvement of Assad's brother, Maher, who as commander of the Republican Guard is another essential regime prop. While his name was removed in the official version, in the initial Microsoft Word document released to the media, the deletion was plainly visible after activating the "track changes" option. This has led to speculation that Mehlis allowed the name to be conspicuous as a warning to the Syrians that the investigation could hit very high, perhaps reaching the president himself.

If the revelations did anything, however, they made it more likely that Assad will be inflexible. His letter to the United Nations (where for some reason the promise to bring Syrians to trial was only included in the text sent to the United States, France and Britain) will provoke more questions than answers. Where would the Syrian suspects be put on trial? In a recent CNN interview, Assad hinted that because he considered Hariri's murder "treason," so a Syrian court might be the appropriate venue. What evidence would Syria consider "concrete" enough to mandate handing over suspects?

Mehlis has asked that Syrian officials be interviewed outside Syria, and it is obvious from his report that he would include both Shawkat and Maher Assad. Indeed, the investigation team had asked to speak to the president himself, but this was rejected. Fulfilling these requests would be the minimum required of Damascus to stave off the prospect of punitive action at the United Nations. But it is highly improbable that either Maher Assad or Shawkat would agree to leave Syria.

Where does this leave Assad? Bogus cooperation will not go far, nor will efforts to try the possible suspects in Syrian courts, unless this follows an internationally endorsed Syrian investigation. It is unlikely that a political deal - where Syria might be offered breathing room in exchange for ending its support for the Iraqi insurgency, leaving Lebanon alone and cutting its ties to Palestinian militant groups and Hezbollah - could avert a handover of officials who might have participated in Hariri's assassination. At best, Assad can play for time and avoid giving Mehlis anything to strengthen his case.

This may be suicidal, but the logic is compelling. Assad knows his final card is the uncertainty surrounding what would follow the demise of his regime. He also knows that if he avoids addressing Mehlis's demands, the Security Council will move into a divisive debate over sanctions and retribution. The Americans and French can push, but can they shove, given Russian and Chinese reluctance and American difficulties in Iraq? Assad will enforce unity inside, but may also accept confrontation outside.

Can it work? The probability isn't very high, but it's all Assad has. The real question, however, is whether political forces inside Syria will sit idly by as the regime takes the country into a period of prolonged uncertainty. There may be no alternatives today to Bashar Assad, but as his regime prepares for a siege, political spaces may be filled by those who do not wish to suffer for the Assads.

(Michael Young is opinion editor of the Daily Star in Lebanon, and a contributing editor at Reason magazine in the United States.)


At 10/28/2005 12:54:00 PM, Blogger Ausamaa said...

The first article by Andrew Tabler gets a passing C- (for Effort only). As how do you by out the regime by a sweetner being the opening of the Syria-Iraq oil pipeline, when the same article states that Syria has $18 bilion in cash reserves? Is an additional one or two billions gonna make a difference in "Syria's" price? Well try to throw in an additional sweetner such as the US stopping its medling in Iraq - or at least do yhat in a smarter less destructive manner as a prelude to full withdrawl-, sweeten it more by forcing Israel to sit down and accept Assad's offer of resuming the negotians to resolve the conflict, sweeten it further by stopping to ask the impossible from Syria such as asking to suffer ties to the Palestinians and Hizbullah, and then you have a pretty good chance that Syria will play along. How about that. Otherwise Tabler said it himself; Syria is used to getting out of such tight places.

F minus however to the report titled "Assad's dilemma" by Andrew Young whose only Agenda seems to be comouflaged hatterd of Syria (people and regime alike), my only comment is : dream on...! You will find receptive ears in certain quarters in Beirut or Washington but not in Syria. Dream on... but be wary of the possibility of getting some "nightmares" desrupitive to your dreams, such as the Syrian people standing by thier leadership in the face of the current torrent of what they may see as false accusations directed at leadership (their Country, they may as well think) from an aggresive unjust attack by someone who wants to re-draw the map of the Middle East to serve an agenda they do not trust niethr like.
Better luck with a less vendictive article next time.

At 10/28/2005 01:43:00 PM, Blogger Syrian Republican Party said...

A geek named Tabler said: “For nearly five years, I have worked as a journalist and researcher in Syria covering the country's reform process”

Wooooowh, maaaaan, uuuuhhhfff, you have been really, really busy dude. Maaaan, how you can do so much in Five years. I mean the amount of reform that Syria’s Baathist Great reformer introduces in one month enough reforms to fill a five years worth. Hell, you are awesome dude, five years to report about NADTHA NOTHING.

What a fucking idiot.

At 10/28/2005 01:59:00 PM, Blogger EHSANI2 said...

I think the above commentary by Ausamaa does not even deserve to be an F- (for both effort or content).

He proposes more sweetners before Syria will "play along". I think he is confused about a very basic fact in life. The weaker you are the worse is your bargaining position. Reading him, one comes away thinking that Bashar is actually the President of The U.S. and not a country under siege which is in a political and economic crisis. But Ausamaa does not seem affected by the 20% unemployment. For that matter, niether are his 18 million compatriots. He reminds us that the Syrian people are standing by their leadership. in the face of accusations from an unjust "Soemone" who wants to redraw the ME. The truth is, however, that the Syrian people don't know any better. They have been in a coma for 40 years. When they rise, they are beatn back to sleep. The baath has been in control of their TV, newspapers, universities for 40 years.

I have one question for Ausamaa:

If the accusations are unjust, why not book a flight to the Hague and take all the people whose names are mentioned in the report. Demand CNN to televise the proceedings and proceed to prove to the world that Mehlis is a lier and an agent of the great Satan.

At 10/28/2005 02:09:00 PM, Blogger Syrian Republican Party said...

Concur with EHSANI2

At 10/28/2005 03:17:00 PM, Blogger Anton Efendi said...

Andrew's piece is ok, though with some inherent paradoxes. My question though is this: isn't what Andrew is asking precisely completely dumping Syria's 30-year old foreign policy?

Secondly, if the country is run by committee (I've called it the inner family circle, and certainly Bashar is part of it, so he's not the odd man out), then what does consolidating power even mean?! He already did that and there is absolutely no progress. Besides, doesn't consolidating more power in the hands of Bashar (a proposal that could be dubious on its own, since it even narrows the base more!) mean dumping Maher and Asef? isn't that what we've talked about (Michael Young, Lee Smith and I) and how it's quite unlikely (as you yourself said)? And that if he tries there's bound to be violence?

So in the end Andrew's proposal takes us nowhere new. It's the same dilemma. Andrew's proposal has already been made through the track changed Mehlis Report. When that report named Asef and Maher, everyone knew the deal. Bashar won't comply with that demand. The question then becomes whether he'll do the old thing of sitting tight, burning up his neighbors, and hope this whole thing goes away (as you advocated in so many words in recent posts). It's a big gamble, and it would be disastrous for all involved if there is no accountability.

At 10/28/2005 03:56:00 PM, Blogger Ausamaa said...

EHSANI2 information on current affairs is not up to date ! A sposkman for the Bush Administration has vetoed down, torpedod, or shrugged off an offer by the Dutch that the International Court of Justice at the Hague. That was yesterday or the day before.

And I never claimed that Bashar Al Assad is George Bush. Actually I take that as an insult no Syrian will accept given Dubbya's intelectual capabilities and performance record and the company he keeps. And it is Mr. Bush who is portraying Syria as a super power that is so influential and so powerful to represent a real impediment to his greater plan for the Middle East. He -Mr. Bush I mean- not I, is the one portraying super power Syria as the root of all his troubles in the area. Makes you wonder whether Mr. Bush is overestimating or overblaming Syria.... Of course, he seems incapable of considering the notion that the fault may lie in his policies not somewhere else.

Finally, I am impressed with your informed kind observation which writes off the Syrian people who have been -as you see them- in coma for the last forty years. But do not worry, they are not in coma, they are alive and kicking which is bothering a lot of "wise" and realistic" people who have given up and raised up thier hands, shaved thier beared and are now exhusted waving the white flag.
Well, come to think about it, if you had Israel at your door step, and the US pounding you and conspiring against you for one reason or another for the last 50 years you will be in more than in coma. And seriously, it is not really a proper manner to describe the people of Syria by a person who is so concerened about Syria as to "sorowfully" note its 20% unemployment rate or what have you. Incidently, what is the unemployment rate in democratic, humanitarian, uncorrupted, god fearing Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan and Saudi??

At 10/28/2005 05:26:00 PM, Blogger Syrian Republican Party said...

This post belong to earlier one, but since no one really read past comment we posted here ( Josh knows this reading habits and he does well to buries comments that are good)

The gulf investors story is a scam. The money invested is not foreign capital but money stolen and laundered from Syrian treasury to shell companies established in the gulf by Assads and his Alawites cronies using bedouins for front cover. Or in few other instance, the washed, stolen cash is invested in Gulf investment houses who then reinvest in Syria.
It is a scam.

Anyway, It is reported by several oppostion groups taht those supposedely Gulf investments will be confiscated by the free people of Syria and those Gulf investment companies will be held liable for aiding and abeting of a Criminal Organization, receiving stolen Syrian treasury receipt, bribery among a thousand other charges. They will be arrested by the (SSS) and brought to face trial and excution in Syria. The investment will be sold to pay for damages brought by Syrian Nationals who suffered under the regime that was aided by these Gulf Bedouin subhumans.

At 10/29/2005 03:20:00 PM, Blogger Syrian Republican Party said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

At 10/29/2005 05:07:00 PM, Blogger Yabroud said...


At 10/30/2005 07:43:00 AM, Blogger Joshua Landis said...

Just got this email from Nassim:

The only word that can describes your assesment of the probable outcome of the Mehlis Report and the fate of the Assad regime which was presented in the article titled "Bolton: The Bull in the Mosaic Shop") is : Wishful thinking.

I'm really appalled by your biased,one-sided,skewed analysis of the Syrian Political Scence. Your unhidden sympathies for the Alawi,minoriterian regime are so obivious.Your approach tends to be not only sympathetic but also
appologetic towards Bashar's behaviour..My bewliderment, however, disappeared when I realized that you're married to a Nusayri woman.

You can't claim to be an objective "Syrian Scholar" when your feelings are focused on the
plight and hopes of your wife's people -- the Alawis..Objectivity demands impartialism -- a trait that you lack in your postings and comments..

Sometimes I wonder If you are employed by the Syrian intelligence services to try and defend the Alawi Ruling gang and present a dicpicable regime in a rosy and favourable manner to the American public through your News Blog..

Syria, Mr. Landis, is predominantly Sunni..The Alawis, sooner or later, will loose power and be punished for the crimes they committed..They are a minority and don't have the right
to rule a country which they represent only 9% of its population.. When a Hispanic ,a Black, a Native-American,or a non-christian becomes President of the
USA,then you can preach us about democracy and defend the right of the Alawis to rule Syria..

Next Time you present your "valued analysis",remember which head you are using -- the upper one or the lower one!!
Regards, Nassim...

At 10/30/2005 09:34:00 AM, Blogger Syrian Republican Party said...

Some jerk posted a comment using the party name. Don't know how, must be pro or tech savvy.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home